Main Page Sitemap

Summary of essay 10 federalist papers

summary of essay 10 federalist papers

terms of safety and protection they stand to gain the most from. When Madison made this prophecy, the accepted opinion among all sophisticated politicians was exactly the opposite. Although these factions are at odds with each other, they frequently work against the public interests, and infringe upon the rights of others. Men who are members of particular factions, or who have prejudices or evil motives might manage, by intrigue or corruption, to win elections and then betray the interests of the people. The first is impossible. Madison's first full statement of this hypothesis appeared in his "Notes on the Confederacy" written in April 1787, eight months before the final version of it was published as the tenth Federalist.

Direct democracies cannot effectively protect personal and property rights and have always been characterized by conflict. Let me help you. At the same time, the parts are so distant and remote, that it is very difficult, either by intrigue, prejudice, or passion, to hurry them into any measure against the public interest." Hume's analysis here had turned the small-territory republic theory upside down:. The framers established a representative form of government, i'll take my stand essays a government in which the many elect the few who govern. Thus, if no interstate proletariat could become organized on purely economic lines, the property of the rich would be safe even though the mass of the people held political power. They will become inclined to negotiate for more mutually beneficial trade. Let us create the best one for you! His most amazing political prophecy, contained within the pages of Federalist 10, was that the size of the United States and its variety of interests could be made a guarantee of stability and justice under the new constitution. This is because the strongest and largest faction dominates, and there is no way to protect weak factions against the actions of an obnoxious individual or a strong majority.